Skip to main content

Movie Arguments Aren't Real

I love a good movie argument.

I was watching "Hitch" a few days ago.  During a speed-dating session Hitch and his potential girlfriend, Sara, are arguing about a misunderstanding.  She (wrongly) thinks that he set her friend up with a guy, Vance, just so he could get laid.  Once Hitch realizes the misunderstanding, he leans across the table, already on his feet, and with the attention of the room yells back at Sara, "Vance is a pig, and I refused to take him on as client!"  This was followed by her stunned silence and Hitch stalking out of the room, righteous and wounded.

It's the kind of argument that everyone wants to have, but probably never will.

I've had enough arguments with Dave to know this by now.  Even the times when I think I'm going into an argument lily-white right with both barrels loaded, I never have a clean get-away.  There's always, every single time, a way I am wrong or something I didn't think of.  I have never gotten a chance to make a profound conclusive remark, stomp my Prada heel, dump my dirty martini on his head, and leave the room.

So how come it happens so often in movies?

We project into our stories what we want, like happy endings.  And we like being right, and dramatically publically perfectly so.

But also, movies aren't as complicated as real life.  After they stalk out of the room, they cut the scene instantly to two weeks later when the heat has blown over and they're finally figuring things out.  In real life, you have to sit through every hour of those two miserable weeks, and the plot line of your life doesn't make promises about the resolution like a romantic comedy does.

And while that righteous moment would be awesome, there's a price to pay for it.  Because you get to be right...but that's not the real goal.  Being right doesn't mean you're resolved.  That vindictive moment is a false ending, because if things are going to get worked out, there's inevitably more to come.  And Hitch may have been right when he left the room, but I'll bet my bottom dollar he felt like crap as he walked out.

In the real world, I have to give up my stalk-out rights.  Many is a time I've wanted to turn up my nose and turn my heel, but I know.  I know better than that.  There's a sigh, and a feeling of rolling up your sleeves; and it's definitely not as gratifying as throwing your cocktail in someone's face.  Heck, if that's all it took, I'd carry around a martini glass with me wherever I went.

But real arguments are less like a flying mixed drink and more like a pair of beers at the table.  You sit down.  You talk for a while.  You get to the bottom of the bottle and feel better, feel closer.  It's low on glitz, but highly effective.

But, regardless, I still love a good movie argument.

Comments

Interesting you put it that way. I was listening the the radio this morning and they were interviewing Ted Dekker, author of several good books, including the Circle Trilogy, Black, Red and White. I highly recommend them if you've never read them. He just wrote a new book called Green which both goes before the Trilogy and after the Trilogy. An extremely new concept. I set all this up to say that while he was talking, Ted Dekker made the comment that fiction is always perfect. And non-fiction, real life, never is. The beauty of non-fiction is its imperfection. The beauty of fiction is the perfection that provides us an escape. Hitch is fiction. Hitch is perfection. Throwing a martini on someone's head is perfection. Sitting down over two beers and having a long painful argument is imperfection. It is real life. It is the stuff non-fiction is made of. I love how you put this, and how interesting that I came across it the same day I heard this conversation on the radio...
~heather said…
man, he really summed that up well, I like that. And it is interesting that you ran into both on the same day :) I'm glad you liked it